Does Cycling Count As Steps On Garmin? (Must Read)

Cycling Count As Steps On Garmin

While some people see no possibility of Garmin extracting steps from cycling, others contest their disbelief.

Because they find Garmin’s functionality amazing: how Garmin devices count steps sweeps them off their feet and therefore makes them never want to doubt Garmin’s capabilities.

Garmin, like other activity trackers like the Apple Watch or Fitbit, can only track the steps due to the movement of your arms. To this effect, cycling cannot be counted as steps; your arms do not move while cycling.

Does Garmin Track Steps While Biking?

Cycling Count As Steps On Garmin

Garmin has not yet been known to track steps while biking. So, it’s a fair response to say ‘no, it does not.

While this may be true, if you are determined to squeeze out steps from your biking exercise, you probably feel impressed or disappointed with yourself, as the case may be.

Then there are conversion methods you might want to implore.

In truth, there’s no guarantee that your results will be accurate or correspond. However, the methods give you a close estimate of the number of steps you took. 

Can You Count Cycling As Steps?

It is presumptuous to think you can count cycling as steps, unimaginable to feel it is practicable, and unprofessional to think activity trackers could do it.

Well, people who are hell-bent on making history may never give up on their belief in the possibility of counting cycling as steps. 

Interestingly, there seem to be alternatives ranging from conversion methods to attaching pedometers on ankles.

Of course, you can strap pedometers anywhere fitting on your body, although your aim for doing that might be everyone’s interest. 

Some people prefer to fasten their activity trackers on their waist, overthinkers will prefer it on their ankles, but the recommended place of attachment is the wrist.

Why Can’t You Count Cycling As Steps?

You can’t do that because it will be challenging for a pedometer to monitor your steps while biking. Only the foot pedometer doesn’t find it too difficult to count your steps.

You can’t boast about the accuracy since it will deal with a different motion. A step can only be counted when a foot is pulled off the ground and taken forward.

Other activity trackers like Fitbit try their best to do what proves impossible, but it only tracks your biking rather than showing your steps.

Fitbit also monitors your health and keeps track of your health record.

How Do You Convert Cycling To Steps?

Kyle’s converter is a good option to convert miles to steps. Just put in the distance you have traveled in miles, and the converter will automatically provide you with the number of steps you’ve taken.

2.5 feet or 0.000473485 miles equals one step. This measurement varies little from person to person. Therefore, it is said to be an approximation, apparently, a close one.

Kyle’s converter isn’t the only method for converting cycling to steps; there are other ways.

#1. Method 1 — Use Online Miles To Steps Converters

Like Kyle’s miles to steps converter, you can use many other online converters. Here, a mile equals 1.609344km, which is as good as 80 chains and equal to 5280 feet.

Hence the distance covered by a step is assumed to be 2.5 feet in stride length.

#2. Method 2 — By Manual Conversion

In terms of calculations, this method provides the same result as method 1, but the difference here is that you will have to do everything by yourself.

Mathematical brains will proudly prefer this method to the former. Nonetheless, it’s more time-efficient and stress-free.

An article revealed that an average man’s stride length is approximately 2.1 – 2.4 ft. That implies that 2,000 steps cover a single mile.

Therefore, it would take 10,000 steps to cover 5 miles. Many verified calculations support this approximation; hence it stands sure.

An experimenter used the information concerning the manual conversion to create a method that will help convert bike miles ( Exercise bikes) to steps.

  • Take ten steps and measure the distance from where you started to where you stopped.
  • Divide the measured distance by the number of steps taken. For instance, if you took ten steps, and the measured distance between each point is 25, you will divide it by 10. If you did that correctly, you should have 2.5 feet as your answer.
  • Convert the miles you have covered with your bicycle into feet. You are at liberty to demand answers from Google, seek a solution from any reliable source, or you could use your brains to calculate by multiplying the miles covered by 5280. Now, you will divide the calculation result by your average stride length.

For example, if you ride 20 miles, here goes the calculation; 5280/5 strides.

#3. Method 3 — By Converting Your Biking Time Into Steps 

This method is another manual conversation and calculation done by multiplying your biking time with a conversion number.

Additionally, unlike other approaches, you can be sure of your bike activity data record. It is because there’s no need to change the position of your activity tracker.

This type of conversation is simple and effective. In this approach, you multiply your biking duration with a conversion number.

Steps tend to be just a byproduct since other functions take precedence.

How Accurate Is Garmin Step Counter?

Garmin has an average step difference of -2.7%. It takes us back to the earlier message I passed.

The -2.7% inaccuracy of Garmin comes with no surprise because it is very difficult to ascertain an actual score as the result of your conversion.

Other wrist-worn activity trackers’ also differ from the underestimated steps assuming all speed levels. 

Some of the trackers are as follows: Jawbone averaged a -5.3% step. Among the trackers, Fitbit has the highest percent difference; it averaged a -10.2% difference step.


Counting cycling as steps proves impossible, however, not for activity trackers like Garmin and the like, which make a near accurate conversion of miles or time to steps.

Other activity trackers like Fitbit, watch, and Jawbone also provides good results for the conversion. While this may be true,  Garmin seems to beat them accuracy-wise.

Josh Matthews

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *